I have read the above article which I consider "game, set and match" as far as truth, depth and accuracy of cover. It does however "ring the Lutine Bell" as far as delivery of anticipated service.
The financial disaster experienced so far is small change when compared to the costs of putting these vessels into service and maintaining them for any length of anticipated service life.
No one wants to look over the hill to even consider potential events.
Given that most vessels will have an anticipated 12- to 18-month build period, equipment delivery and systems preservation/activation are programmed for minimal site exposure to preserve reliability for trials and service.
Given the lengthy period (years) systems and equipment have lain exposed to the Scottish climate, it is doubtful the vessels will ever make acceptance delivery.
Of main concern will be:
The list is endless. The cost in terms of replacement will be astronomical and time projections, months.
Given the high profile of these vessels and their potential failure, flag state and class authorities will be on high alert and well versed in these potentials and well aware of reputation damage to ignore the obvious.
All the above is of course a precursor to getting the vessels "of merchantable quality" and "fit for purpose" to go on yard trials even before handover to owners!
Of course the caveats of "no guarantee", plus the government-owned yard and shipowner, mean the incurred costs are to "Joey Taxpayer", and subject to "left pocket to right pocket" accountancy practices.
Nevertheless the Armageddon has not arrived. Yet.
Regards,
Eur.Ing. Joe Mckee. C.Eng.,C.Mar.Eng.F.I.Mar.EST
Retired
Dundee, Scotland
An injustice on your mind? Want to get something off your chest? Please direct all letters to the editor to editor@bairdmaritime.com